28 Years Later: The Bone Temple Review: Turning it Up to Eleven.

28 Years Later was one of my favorite films of 2025.
I found it to be a gripping post-apocalyptic coming-of-age story, which carried a touching message about the acceptance of death.
That being said, the film was divisive among general audiences, mostly due to its bizarre ending.
While I did enjoy said ending, I can definitely see how a group of ninja, Satan worshipping, Jimmy Saville cosplayers showing up out of nowhere rubbed people the wrong way.

The wackiness of 28 Years Later‘s ending is instantly dropped for a brutal reality.

Nevertheless, after the film ended, I was immediately on board for its follow up, The Bone Temple.
Being shot back-to-back with 28 Years Later, we thankfully did not have to wait two years to see it, like most sequels these days.
Having seen the film on the day of release, I can say that The Bone Temple definitely lived up to my expectations, even if I do prefer the previous movie.
Picking up from 28 Years Later’s cliffhanger, The Bone Temple sees the young Spike (Alfie Williams) violently inducted into the Jimmy gang, led by the charismatic and deranged sadist, Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell).
At the same time, Dr Ian Kelson (Ralph Fieness) finds himself forming an unusual bond with the Infected Alpha he has named Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry) and begins to wonder if treating the Rage Virus is possible. 
As the film progresses, the two storylines converge, resulting in a confrontation between Jimmy and Kelson at the titular Bone Temple and the conflict of their embodied ideals: peace vs chaos, kindness vs brutality.
These two opposing characters with their opposing beliefs are the focal point of the film. 

Pure good meets pure evil in The Bone Temple.

I already loved Dr Kelson’s character from 28 Years Later.
Spending over two decades in isolation and building a temple of bone to memoralize the deaths of millions, Kelson kept his humanity, helping to ease the suffering of Spike’s mother.
He continues his humanitarian efforts in The Bone Temple through his aid of Samson, with Ralph Fieness playing the role to perfection. 
In times of despair and chaos, we need a man like Dr Kelson. 

Kelson’s humanity is a shining light in a world of darkness.

What we certainly do not need is a man like Jimmy Crystal.
Played brilliantly by Jack O’Connell, the traumatised young survivor of the outbreak has transformed into a demented cult leader, hellbent on bringing as much pain and suffering he can in the name of his imagined father “Old Nick.”
His cult members are almost as demented, gleefully indulging in Jimmy’s idea of “charity.”
Their childlike nature is just as disturbing, with it being abundantly clear that these violent lunatics were once ordinary children before Britain fell. 

O’Connell has a knack for playing unhinged villains.

This makes the characters obvious visual similarities to notorious predator Jimmy Saville all the creepier.
Just as he twisted the innocence of children in real life, so has this brutal world the Jimmys grew up in.
And, boy, is it brutal.
28 Years Later was violent but The Bone Temple is on another level.
Brains are eaten and skin is flayed in numerous wince inducing scenes which, again, made the humanitarian efforts of Dr Kelson all the more important.
If the Jimmy gang are the children destroyed by the world, Samson is the child Kelson hopes to restore.
Chi Lewis-Parry brings both a sense of brutality and innocence to the role of the Infected Alpha.
Samson is a complex character, whether he is ripping someone’s head off, remembering the past or, more often than not, running around butt naked with all 28 inches flopping around in the wind… 

Sorry, could not resist making that joke.

However, while I do think the characters of Kelson, Jimmy and Samson are all great, I unfortunately found Spike’s to be a bit limited in this move.
He mostly just stands around looking horrified at what the Jimmys are doing which, fair enough, but I kind of wanted to see him do more after the first film.
There is also the character of Jimmy Ink (Erin Kellyman), by far the most humanized of the Jimmys, due to her sibling-like bond with Spike.
While I think she was well acted, the writing let her down a little because, even after the movie ended, I was not entirely sure what her goals were, or what she had planned after those goals were met.

I feel like I needed a little more detail to fully understand Jimmy Ink’s character

Along with this, while I liked the style of director Nia DaCosta, I missed the unique flair of Danny Boyle’s from 28 Years Later. 
My final criticism is that there was one scene hyped up in the trailer that was absent from the film.
Although this is more the trailer’s fault than the movie’s.
All of that being said, these are only minor issues, and the rest of the film more than makes up for them, especially the third act.
As I stated, the conflict between Kelson and Jimmy is the highlight of the film, culminating in a tremendous climax, which needs to be seen in theaters. 

Prepare to get Iron Maiden’s The Number of the Beast stuck in your head.

Although I prefer 28 Years Later’s emotional journey, The Bone Temple offers a more than worthy sequel, with a compelling battle of ideals between its protaganist and antagonist.
I look forward to seeing the third film in this trilogy, where an iconic actor is poised to take center stage… or, at least, he will in about two years when that final film comes out.
Yeah, since the third movie was only recently greenlit, we are unfortunately going to have to wait a while for its release, unlike The Bone Temple. 
So, until then, memento mori.  

Sinners Review: The Vampire Hits Keep Coming.

There has been a vampire resurgence over the last few years, with various different films.
Last year’s Abigail was a fun movie with a lot of humor.
Nosferatu (which I unfortunately never got around to reviewing) was a masterful remake of one of the world’s first horror movie.
Which brings us to 2025’s Sinners. 

Sinners is the next in a recent line of successful vampire films.

Directed by Ryan Coogler, the film juggles many genres from vampire flick, to gangster film, to a study of black culture in the 1930s, and, of all things, a borderline musical.
The story follows the Smokestack Twins, both played by Michael B. Jordan, former gangsters who return to their hometown to open a juke joint.
Recruiting their cousin Sammie to perform, all seems to be going well until a group of vampires show up to ruin the party. 
The performances in Sinners are all fantastic.
Michael B. Jordan brings the Smokestack Twins to life with two very different performances.

Stack is sociable while Smoke is a lot colder, personality wise.

Hailee Steinfeld is also great as Mary, Stack’s former flame.
Then there is Jack O’Connell, who is delightfully charismatic as Remmick, the leader of the vampires.
The standout of the movie, however, is definitely Miles Caton as Sammie.
What makes his performance so amazing is that this is his first role in a movie.
I hope this leads to a strong career in film for him because he knocked it out of the park both with his acting and singing.

Like I many, I was shocked to hear this was Caton’s first movie role because of how good he is here.

Speaking of which, the music of Sinners is a character itself.
I called the film a borderline musical earlier, due to it having many musical performances, from old blues to Irish line dancing.
Every musical sequence is great and elevated by wonderful cinematography in what are undoubtedly some of the best movie scenes this year.
Sinners is full of great scenes, whether they be from the setup of the first half or the vampire carnage of the second.
The fact that I enjoyed both of these halves equally should show how great I consider the film to be.
If Sinners had just been about the Smokestack Twins establishing their juke joint, I am sure it would have been just as interesting as the version with the vampires. 

Having vampires does not hurt thought.

But do I have any criticisms of the movie?
Well, a few, although they are very minor.
My first criticism is that there are a few points in the film where random red shirt characters, who I am certain were not there before, show up just to die and add to the body count.
It drew me out of the movie a couple of times, as I wondered where these characters had come from.
My second issue is that the trailer gave away some of the characters who get turned into vampires, but that is more an issue with the trailer than the movie itself. 

There are two big transformations spoiled by the trailer, which is a shame.

Otherwise, Sinners is a brilliant vampire movie.
It has outstanding acting and singing, compelling commentary and cinematography, and a great mid-credits scene which ties the movie together (seriously, do not leave once the credits start rolling or you will miss something big).
Sinners is my favourite Ryan Coogler film and another great addition to the growing vampire flick resurgence.