Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny Review: A Decent Enough Ending.

Indiana Jones is one of the most celebrated franchises of all time.
Even if its fourth installment was a big let-down, the original trilogy of Raiders of the Lost Arc, the Temple of Doom, and the Last Crusade are all rightly considered classics.
So when a new and most likely final film, Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny was announced, fans were both excited and nervous.
Would this be as good as the films of the original trilogy or a disaster like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull?
Well, it turns out the answer is neither because Dial of Destiny simply alright.
It is a descent conclusion to the character of Indiana Jones with things to like and dislike about it. 

The Dial of Destiny is an okay film but that an Indiana Jones film should definitely be more than that.

Directed by James Mangold, the film follows an elderly Jones (Harrison Ford) who is just about to retire from his job after suffering a family tragedy, when his goddaughter Helena (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) shows up.
She is here to take one of Indie’s artifacts, a piece of the Antikythere, which is an ancient device created by the Greek philosopher Archimedes to supposedly travel through time.
However, Helena is being pursued by Nazis who were pardoned for their cooperation after World War Two.
They are led by Dr Jürgen Voller (Mads Mikkelsen), a Nazi scientist Jones encountered decades before and now wants to use the Antikythere to change the course of the war.
And so, Indiana Jones has to go on one more, final adventure with Helena and her young friend Teddy (Ethan Isidore) to stop Voller. 

It’s a race to complete the Antikythere to stop the Nazis from winning WW2.

Whatever anyone may think about the Dial of Destiny, I don’t think any of them could deny that it was good to see Harrison Ford in the role of Indiana Jones for what will most likely be the last time.
As expected, Ford does a fantastic job as the character, even though it has been so many years since he played him.
He brings a lot of weight to his performance, both emotionally and physically.
I say physically because I quite liked the way Indie’s age was showcased.
It is quite clear that he is not as strong as he once was, given his age and this is portrayed well.
As for his youngers days, this is also showcased with the opening scene, which sees a digitally altered Indie working with Helena’s father Bazel (Toby Jones), fighting Nazis on a train.
This is the best scene of the film, with the CGI used to de-age Ford working, for the most part. 

The de-ageing used on Harrison Ford works, except for a few instances. Although it is weird to hear Ford’s older voice come from a younger looking Indie.

What works less is the CGI used for the action, both in this scene and in the rest of the movie.
One of the many things that make the original trilogy great is how practical they are.
You could really feel the weight of the action because you knew that what you were seeing was mostly real.
Constant CGI, on the other hand, adds a level of disconnect because you can often tell what you are looking at is not there.
This was a problem with Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and it is a problem here.
Although, to be fair, I do understand that some CGI was necessary because we cannot expect the 80-year-old Ford to pull off the stunts he used to. 

I do understand that some CGI was necessary for Ford but I wish there had been more practical effects than digital.

As for the younger actors in this movie, they unfortunately left a bit to be desired.
Helena is a very unlikeable character for the first half of the movie and, while I do understand that this was likely the intent, with the writers probably hoping her growth would in turn make her grow on the viewer, unfortunately I think they went a bit overboard with it.
Helena is quite callous throughout much of the movie and it is difficult to forget that, even when she has her development. 

The writers really should have dialled down Helena’s callousness because it made her difficult to like even after her arc.

As for Teddy, while he does get one standout moment, it did not feel like there was enough to make me latch onto him as a character.
It is the same for Voller who is serviceable as the villain but nothing beyond that.
Boyd Holbrook’s role is worse, with his henchman character being entirely forgettable. 
One thing that is certainly not forgettable, however, is the film’s third act, which goes in a crazy direction that I think may feel like a jump-the-shark moment for many viewers.
Personally, I quite enjoyed this twist, crazy as it was.
It is was some of the characters’ abrupt decisions during this third act that made me scratch my head, honestly. 

Although some of the choices made in the third act are weird, it is still the most memorable scene in the movie, along with the first scene.

This builds into an ending that is emotionally cathartic but also not without its issues because the film forgets to resolve a plot point it set up in the first act, creating quite a jarring plot hole. 
So overall, the Dial of Destiny has a lot of issues.
It is certainly not without its merits, with the first scene, Ford’s performance, and the crazy third act making the film enjoyable.
However, as an Indiana Jones film, it fails to live up to the legacy set by the original trilogy. 
A decent film to be sure but Indiana Jones should never be just decent.     

Blade Runner 2049: An instant classic

5 stars
With all the superhero movies and remakes, it is very rare that we get a stylish film that becomes a classic but Blade Runner 2049 is that movie.
Directed by Denis Villeneuve, Blade Runner 2049 is the sequel to the classic sci-fi noir thriller Blade Runner and stars Ryan Gosling, Harrison Ford and Ana de Armas.
It really did surprise me how much I loved this movie, considering I first watched Blade Runner a week ago and did not think it was as good as everyone says it is.
It is a good film and I can see the impact it has left on cinema, but at the same time I don’t think it is the flawless classic everyone makes it out to be.
In fact I think the sequel is better than the original.
For one thing, I connected far more with Ryan Gosling’s K in this movie than I ever did with Deckard in the original Blade Runner.
K blade runner
I did not only connect with K but the other characters in this movie as well.
Ana de Armas was great as Joi, K’s love interest, and I found their romance sadly tragic given what we learn by the end of the film.
Even Deckard was done better here because I sympathized with him more than I did in Blade Runner.
The story is also a lot better as much more is at stake than there was in Blade Runner and the mystery is far more interesting.
There are so many twists and turns in the story that I couldn’t wait to see where it would go.
There is one twist about half an hour before the movie ends that I initially was not too sure if I liked but after thinking about it more I think it worked better than the alternative.
It is also kind of funny how they reveal something which could have been a big twist for the movie at the beginning of the film, and in a very offhand way.
It worked brilliantly for the story.
This film is also visually stunning.
Blade Runner 2049 is, without a doubt, the most beautiful film of 2017.
Every shot is full of life and colour.
The cinematographer definitely deserves an award for his work here.
blade runner visuals
Along with the cinematography, the music and visuals are also spectacular.
The music is epic and a real improvement on the already great music from Blade Runner.
Then there are the visuals, which are about as incredible as everything else.
They do something using CGI like they did in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, however, unlike then, the CGI is uncanny and looks incredibly realistic.
If you are going into this movie expecting to see Harrison Ford in a main role, do not expect much.
Despite what the trailers show you, Ford is not in the movie all that much and does not get much screen time.
However, his presence is still definitely required for the story to work and Ford gives a great performance as Deckard, as expected.
dekcard
Although I loved Blade Runner 2049, I must admit this movie will not be for everyone.
This movie is two hours and forty three minutes long and it has a very slow pace.
That slow pace is definitely earned and the movie is better with it but I can see how some people might find this movie to be a boring slog.
I, on the other hand, loved this movie.
It has great characters, fantastic visuals, music and cinematography and, to top it all off, the story is engrossing.
I have no doubt that, despite it falling below expectations at the box office, it will be viewed as a classic by many, just as the original is.
I urge you to go and check it out.